Making Cloud SLAs readily usable in the EU private sector
SLA Repository
Trusted providers committed to greater transparency in cloud services
The SLA Repository provides you with a list of Cloud Service Providers that have carried out a self-assessment on their own SLAs based on the SLA-Ready Common Reference Model. Use our repository to find out how well these providers are aligned to our reference model which provides 30 essential elements that you should find in any cloud SLA.
From data protection and service credit, to Service Level Objectives and security, find out more about the SLA Common Reference model here.
You can also access further information about the providers and their services. Remember, all providers listed are committed to being transparent in their SLAs and to providing greater trust in cloud computing.
The SLA Repository is part of the SLA-Ready drive towards increasing transparency in Cloud SLAs, thus building customer trust.
We invite CSPs to be part of repository easly respond to a simple questionnaire to assess the relative importance of each Common Reference Model element.
CSP | 7bulls.com | Atlassian | China Enterprise ICT Sloutions Limited | CITEC | Encore Lab S.L. | ILAND | Indra Sistemas | MailGuard | Qinec Ltd | Siteimprove |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLA URL | Link | Link | ||||||||
Findable | Homepage link | Homepage link | Internal search engine | Homepage link | ||||||
Choice of law | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Roles and responsabilities | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Cloud SLA definitions | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Revision date | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Update Frequency | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Previous versions and revisions | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
SLA duration | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
SLA language | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Machine-readable format | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Nr. of pages | 15 | 1 | 12 | 5 | ||||||
Contact details | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Contact availability | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service Credit | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Service credits assignment | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Maximum service credits | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
SLA change notifications | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Unilateral change | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Service Levels reporting | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service Levels continuous reporting | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Feasibility of specials & customisations | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
General Carveouts | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Specified SLO metrics | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
General SLOs | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Cloud Service Performance SLOs | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Service Reliability SLOs | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Data Management SLOs | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Security SLOs | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Personal Data Protection SLOs | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |